Hi everyone

I know that I don't 'police' the forums as I once did, but I come on occasionally and I moderate anything that looks really bad to me ~ eg porn, etc.
There are a few things that I would like to say:
1. It is assumed that Lisa, Jilly or will automatically notice anything that anyone else might find offensive in any way. This, of course, is not the case. If you see something that breaks the rules or offends, then do click on 'notify.' This is what should be done ~ rather than sending PMs.
2. It is often assumed that everyone on here is offended by the same thing. This, also, is not the case. I am not talking specifically about current members, but about a trend. There is a trend on this forum for groups of friends to develop and for one group of friends to disagree with the other ~ or with new members ~ for whatever reasons, and then to send critical messages or alerts, each about the other ~ accusing them of being 'trolls' or of breaking rules, etc, etc.
I have had to spend hours, in the past, trying to untangle these disagreements. So, please remember ~ just because you think that you are right does not mean that everyone agrees with you. or, indeed, that they should agree with you. Always think, before you post, whether your tone or content could cause a negative effect on anyone.
I also think that some members have found the forum to feel a bit like a 'clique'. They see that one or two people dominate the number of posts and feel that they do not belong, or are not wanted ~ especially if they or their budgie skills are being criticised (and, yes, capital letters do upset people more, so I am pleased that Lisa has added that rule).
Messages about such an atmosphere on the forum have been flying around for some time ~ well before this current debacle, so Lisa is correct in saying that this recent upset is just one example of things that need looking at.
And this is nothing to do with the knowledge that members share and the help available. Rather, it is about the way people are made to feel when the information is given ~ and whether they get a negative 'feel' from the forum. If so, they will leave and they will not benefit from the help on offer ~ and neither will their pets! This would be very sad and is surely not what animal lovers want to happen.
3. 'Trolls'. What are they?
As Lisa said, we have had people on here labelled as 'trolls' from the minute they make their first post. Some may be. Others certainly are not. Some have been lambasted to such an extent that they have become very rude in response and have eventually been banned ~ for bad language, perhaps ~ when it was not their fault in the first place.
And, as Lisa also said, some of the people who say things that offend are having severe problems and need our help a lot more than others.
3. I know that Lisa has said that she does not want to concentrate, specifically, on one poster, but it seems that some members do ~ and the person in question is, presumably, 'OldPplLoveBirds'. If he is a 'troll' ~ seeking attention ~ then he must be having a field day. It would have been far better to ignore the bait, but some preferred to take it.
What has he done?
Written a little poem.
Asked two questions:
~ 'is it likely that albatrosses would ever resort to homosexuality - i ask because albatrosses are maybe like sailors who resort to homosexuality on long journies'
~ 'i want to see if it possible what it is i want to know if i can possibly force an albatross to have sex and imseminate a parakeet; i ask bcause i want to see if we can have like a giant parakeet because there so pretty but not very big'
'Serious' and 'unemotional' responses were given ~ and things that might be considered offensive were pointed out. I think that this is the best way to respond, while we sort out what is really going on. But then angry and very emotional posts were made ~ in spite of the fact that we warn members never to feed 'trolls' and not to take the bait. If that really is a troll, then those who did this responded exactly as he would have wanted.
As to his questions:
What if they had been worded slightly differently:
~ Albatrosses live quite solitary lives, do you think that, when there are no females around, they ever behave homosexually?
~ I think that a large colourful keet would be beautiful ~ is it possible to cross a parakeet with a much larger bird ~ even something as large as an albatross? They wouldn't mate in nature, so would I have to force them to mate?
What I am asking is this ~ is it the ideas in the posts that are offensive, or the vocabulary used?
If it is the vocabulary, then I wonder ~ have you considered that some people have not had as good an education as others, and that, for some people, English is their second language? Therefore, dismissing people out of hand, without allowing them a chance to prove themselves, is not always the best way to respond.
4. Lisa has set up this board which, as most would agree, is usually a pleasant place to converse. Surely this means that, generally, the admin team makes good decisions, so, why is it that the admin team is not trusted to do the right thing? (Bearing in mind that no-one is perfect.)
If an alert is sent, one or all of us will keep an eye on things, but, if forum members 'feed the trolls', then they will be well-nourished and will thrive. Unless it is obvious that someone is causing trouble from the start ~ and what may seem obvious to some may not always be correct ~ the best thing is to ignore the posts in question and let the admin team keep an eye on things.
That's about it for now, I think
